Posted by
Fresh Bread on Friday, December 08, 2006 4:11:15 PM
What if Christians did spiritual warfare the way some of our politicians want to fight the war on terrorism? Would the church be better off?
America has not "won" a major war since World War II. The Gulf War cannot be considered a victory; it returned the situation in the Middle East to the status quo. The aggressor in that war, Saddam Hussein, would remain in power for another dozen years. The Vietnam War was surely a loss. The Korean War ended in stalemate; North Korea, the aggressor in that war, remains militant and dangerous 50 years later.
If a Christian had not won a spiritual battle in his life for sixty years, would he be better as a result?
It has been six decades since we emerged fully victorious from a major war. Why is this so? Perhaps, it is because the very definition of war has changed. War use to be where a military goes into a county to conquer. This means that things are destroyed and people are killed. There is a shock and awe philosophy. It is done quickly and decisively. At the same time, the conquers tear apart the enemy's motivating ideology by its roots. The United States in WW2 was the aggressor. They not only started well, but they equally had the will to finish well too. There was no concern over what others thought. A job had to be done and it got done. When the dust settled, the United States was on top.
If the Christian church fought spiritually the way America (under the leadership of some our Washington leaders) seems to be fighting militarily, could the church survive? Hardly so! Our Commander-in-Chief would not stand for it.
So what is going wrong? Well for one thing, we seem to capitulate on using force. We got the means, but not the will to fight. It appears that the men and women in the military have such a will, but those in charge do not. That’s because they are more concern with election results, appeasing constituencies and setting in stone their own legacy in a positive light. It is as if they wait to see which way the wind is blowing and then set their sails toward the wind.
Second, we have taken on the modus operandi of reacting to the enemy rather than taking steps to properly respond. In other words, we get tough only after some tragedy occurs. Rather than taking steps to avoid such things, we seek to negotiate, make concessions, compromise, and hope that we will be liked and understood for trying. If such things do not work in our favor, we brace ourselves for an attack, while living in fear. So when we are attacked first, then we feel justified to use force as the last alternative. Nevertheless, we are made to feel guilty for even wanting to respond to an attack. We go forth with fury, but then taper off because we are not to suppose to flex so much of our muscles on anyone including those who have considered us their enemy.
But again, if Christians fought their spiritual battles in this way, would the church win over the kingdom of darkness?
Next, we try to illicit the help of others with similar ideologies as our enemy. Why are we so determine to negotiate with Iran and Syria? Is not Syria behind Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iran behind the terrorist insurgency in Iraq? Would such countries want to partner with the great Satan (i.e. the U.S.) without coming out a head themselves in some way?
What to do, for example, with the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who directly threatens the United States? He said, "God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism." Only recently, he elaborated. In talks in Qatar with Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, Ahmadinejad said, "The Zionist regime was created to establish dominion of arrogant states over the region and to enable the enemy to penetrate the heart Muslim land." Haniyeh said Israel was "on the verge of disappearing." "There is no doubt the Palestinian nation and Muslims as a whole will emerge victorious," the Iranian president had said.
What would happen to the church if Christians got together and asked the religious groups that denied the fundamentals of the Christian faith (justification by faith, substitutionary death of Christ, bodily resurrection of Jesus, sufficiency of the Scriptures, blood atonement, etc.) to partner with it in order to do spiritual warfare? Would that fly with God?
Perhaps, we Christians would have a better life, less trials, and more prosperity and blessings, if we just partnered with the devil. Give him what he wants while we still name the name of Christ.
How does one negotiate with someone who believes that “lying” if done under the right circumstances can be used to advance one’s cause?
In Brigitte Gabriel's excellent book, ''Because they Hate'' she quotes the renowned classical Islamic scholar and theologian Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali (1058-1111). He instructs that ''[s]peaking is a means to achieve objectives,'' and that ''it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible.''
She goes on to quote Amir Taheri, author of many books on Islam and the Middle East, who states according to Islam, ''Muslims have every right to lie and to deceive their adversaries, and a promise made to non-Muslims can be broken whenever necessary.''
According to Abdullah al-Araby, ''within Islam there are certain provisions under which lying is not simply tolerated, but actually encouraged.'' The book, ''The Spirit of Islam,'' by the Muslim scholar Afif A. Tabbarah states, ''Lying is not always bad, to be sure; there are times when telling a lie is more profitable and better for the general welfare, and for the settlement of conciliation among people, then telling the truth. To this effect, the Prophet says: 'He is not a false person who [through lies] settles conciliation among people, supports good or says what is good.'''
Gabriel points out in her book, ''Since the sacred goal of jihad is to make Islam 'supreme in the world' every lie told to achieve that goal is not only permitted, but sanctified.'' She does an excellent job of describing how ''taqiyya and kithman'' are used to lie and deceive in the name of Allah. Her book should be required reading for all in America, especially members of the Iraq Study Group who believe you can negotiate with the likes of Ahmadinejad or Baashar al-Assad who are allowed, if not encouraged, by their faith to lie for Allah.
Look back at history and you will clearly see the ability of Muslim leaders to lie and deceive. Yassar Arafat, grandfather of the modern day suicide bombers, had an Allah-given gift for telling lies. Not one Muslim country welcomed his ''Palestinians.'' Look at what the Palestinians did to the once peaceful and beautiful nation of Lebanon. Do the names Hezbollah or Hamas ring a bell? How about Saddam and the weapons inspectors or his ability to honor the terms of the Gulf War cease-fire that allowed him to keep breathing? I thought Iran didn't have any nuclear ambitions? Now they do? Lies work with the West and our enemies know it.
So I ask again, how would the church of Jesus Christ do today, if we tried to strike a deal with our spiritual enemy whom Jesus called the “father of lies” (John 8:44)? Should we even consider such a proposal?
Brigitte continues: Tolerating evil is a crime. Appeasing murderers doesn't buy protection. It earns one disrespect and loathing in the enemy's eyes. Yet apathy is the weapon by which the West is committing suicide. Political correctness forms the shackles around our ankles, by which Islamists are leading us to our demise.
If you want to understand the nature of the enemy we face, visualize a tapestry of snakes. They slither and they hiss, and they would eat each other alive, but they will unite in a hideous mass to achieve their common goal of imposing radical Islam on the world.
We are fighting a powerful ideology that is capable of altering basic human instincts. An ideology that can turn a mother into a launching pad of death. A perfect example is a recently elected Hamas official in the Palestinian Territories who raves in heavenly joy about sending her three sons to death and offering the ones who are still alive for the cause. It is an ideology that is capable of offering highly educated individuals such as doctors and lawyers far more joy in attaining death than any respect and stature, life in society is ever capable of giving them.
America cannot effectively defend itself in this war unless and until the American people understand the nature of the enemy that we face. Even after 9/11 there are those who say that we must “engage” our terrorist enemies, that we must “address their grievances”. Their grievance is our freedom of religion. Their grievance is our freedom of speech. Their grievance is our democratic process where the rule of law comes from the voices of many not that of just one prophet. It is the respect we instill in our children towards all religions. It is the equality we grant each other as human beings sharing a planet and striving to make the world a better place for all humanity. Their grievance is the kindness and respect a man shows a woman, the justice we practice as equals under the law, and the mercy we grant our enemy. Their grievance cannot be answered by an apology for who or what we are.
. . . if we don't believe in ourselves as Americans and in the standards we should hold every patriotic American to, we are going to pay a price for our delusion. For the sake of our children and our country, we must wake up and take action. In the face of a torrent of hateful invective and terrorist murder, America’s learning curve since the Iran hostage crisis is so shallow that it is almost flat. The longer we lay supine, the more difficult it will be to stand erect. (from Brigitte Gabriel's speech delivered at the Intelligence Summit in Washington DC, Saturday February 18, 2006)
Don’t be fooled by the terms you are hearing coming from Washington. Terms such as “consensus.” Remember this: Consensus is simply an absence of leadership. Also, the Irag Study Group uses the term “Success” in place of “victory.” You see, “success” can be defined anyway one chooses. But victory means you got to win the war!
All we can do is pray for our leaders in office and ask God to help them to make right choices. We can also pray for our men and women serving in the military. They are the ones caught in the middle of all this. But as Christians, let’s not ever fight our spiritual battles the way our country fights its wars within the last six decades.
Winston Church once said: “The nation had to choose between shame and war. We have chosen shame. We shall get the war as well."
Later he said: "There is no merit in putting off a war for a year if when it comes it will be a worse war and harder to win."
What would our Commander-in-Chief do? “God stripped the spiritual rulers and powers of their authority. With the cross, he won the victory and showed the world that they were powerless” (Col. 2:15 NCV). This is victory and this is leadership.